American Academy of Periodontology Journal of Periodontology Online Welcome Guest
Sign in | Register
 
Abstract
January 2008, Vol. 79, No. 1, Pages 49-54 , DOI 10.1902/jop.2008.070248
(doi:10.1902/jop.2008.070248)

Clinical Outcome of Narrow Diameter Implants: A Retrospective Study of 510 Implants

Marco Degidi,* Adriano Piattelli, and Francesco Carinci

*Dental School, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

†Dental School, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.

‡Head and Neck Department, Section of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Correspondence: Dr. Francesco Carinci, Head and Neck Department, Section of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ferrara, Corso Giovecca, 203, 44100 Ferrara, Italy. Fax: 39-0532-291582; e-mail: .

Background: Narrow diameter implants ([NDIs]; diameter <3.75 mm) are a potential solution for specific clinical situations such as reduced interradicular bone, thin alveolar crest, and replacement of teeth with small cervical diameter. NDIs have been available in clinical practice since the 1990s, but only a few studies have analyzed their clinical outcome.

Methods: From November 1996 to February 2004, 237 patients were selected, and 510 NDIs were inserted. Implant diameter ranged from 3.0 to 3.5 mm, multiple implant systems were used, and 255 implants were restored immediately without loading (IRWL). No statistical differences were detected among the studied variables. Consequently, marginal bone loss (MBL) was considered an indicator of the success rate (SCR) to evaluate the effect of several host-, surgery-, and implant-related factors. A general linear model (GLM) was used to detect those variables statistically associated with MBL.

Results: Only three of 510 implants were lost (survival rate [SRR] = 99.4%), and no differences were detected among the studied variables. On the contrary, the GLM showed that delayed loading and longer (>13 mm) and larger (3.4 and 3.5 mm) NDIs reduced MBL.

Conclusions: NDIs have a high SRR and SCR, similar to those reported in previous studies of regular diameter implants. Moreover, IRWL of NDIs is a reliable procedure, although a slightly higher bone resorption is reported compared to delayed loading. No implant fractures were detected in the present series.

KEYWORDS: Dental implants, linear model

Cited by

, , , , . (2010) Factors Associated with Failure of Surface-Modified Implants up to Four Years of Function. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research no-no
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.
CrossRef
, , , . (2010) Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 21:3, 296-307
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2010.
CrossRef
, . (2009) Implants (3.3mm Diameter) for the Rehabilitation of Edentulous Posterior Regions: A Retrospective Clinical Study with Up to 11 Years of Follow-Up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009.
CrossRef
Full Text PDF (150.567 KB) PDF Plus (169.166 KB)
 

Previous Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (151 KB)
View PDF Plus (169 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

Quick Search
for
Authors:
Marco Degidi
Adriano Piattelli
Francesco Carinci
Keywords:
Dental implants
linear model

© 2010 American Academy of Periodontology. All rights reserved.
Disclaimers apply | Privacy commitment | Contact AAP
Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.

Einen Moment bitte..